Skip to content

On Proudly owning Many Books – Popula

In my final yr of highschool, I
carried seven-hundred-odd pages of the hardcover The Collected Poems of
Langston Hughes, all over the place I went. It was in pristine situation once I first
checked it out from the media middle, the cellophane of its protecting cowl
sticking to my palms with pores and skin oil and sweat. My wrist would ache from cradling
its density at my aspect, and as I made my manner by the halls of my
overwhelmingly white public college–constructed twenty years after desegregation to
serve a rich white tax base–Hughes’s strains would reverberate with
miserable relevance.

I carried the guide round as a result of
I beloved it, and for a similar cause my youthful brother wore his Public Enemy
shirt to class, to announce myself in a whisper: I used to be a reader, a black
reader. I renewed Hughes from the college library for months, wandering with him
down the divergent phases of his poetic profession in the direction of my very own commencement and
imminent departure for New York, the dreamer, the lyricist, the communist. It
was not misplaced on me that I used to be in a position to preserve checking it out as a result of nobody else
in school requested it.

I considered stealing it,
about making it mine ceaselessly. However although I finally returned it, in barely
lower than pristine situation, the guide had executed its work. I had claimed it, it
had claimed me, led me to Leadbelly and Marx and, ultimately, to Harlem, the place
I lived in an residence across the nook from Una Mulzac’s Liberation Books, a
former haven for black readers revealed to have been
surveilled by the
publically-funded US Federal Bureau of Investigations.

Final yr, I lastly determined to personal
a duplicate of The Collected Poems of Langston Hughes. However when its 736 pages
arrived—ordered immediately from and delivered the following day by Amazon, a non-public
firm—I acknowledged my mistake: the guide didn’t spark pleasure (because the one who has
sparked a lot ire among the many book-fetishizing world would put it). The guide couldn’t
imply to me now what it had meant to me then; proudly owning it couldn’t recapture the
electrical energy of that studying expertise, nor deepen my private declare. As an alternative, it
sits on my shelf gathering mud, like so many different volumes in my personal library.
As an alternative of my previous, these books solely conjure visions of the inevitable future,
of the day once I might be lifeless, and another person is burdened with the duty of executing
my will and dismantling the fortress of books separating my physique from the world.

It troubles me. I personal many books.
I’d like every to signify a studying expertise I’ve had or hope to. However I have to
admit that every, additionally, represents a transaction, an change that conferred personal
possession on me. Maybe the difficulty is in that house, between studying and
proudly owning, between the non-public and the personal.

me, this confusion began with Hiram’s Pink Shirt, the story of a poor
white farmer named Hiram who retains patching holes in his favourite shirt, at
first with different elements of the shirt then with different articles of clothes, till
he winds up sacrificing rattling close to his whole wardrobe for the one shirt,
lastly caving and shopping for a brand new shirt. Somewhat than do away with the outdated shirt, Hiram
retains the ineffective, ruined article as a memento.

Proudly owning this guide tore the primary
of many lovely book-shaped holes in me; I
patched it, at first, by studying the guide again and again, memorizing its dozen
or so pages and shade illustrations till the factor was as tattered because the poor
farmer’s shirt, the duvet gone, the backbone spindly, the guide object an uncanny
manifestation of topic. Like Hiram together with his shirt, I stored the guide after I
had outgrown it as a type of document of self, in my first guide.

Since receiving Hiram’s Pink Shirt on my fifth birthday, a
disproportionate quantity of what I personal is books, books which have patched or
opened related rips, and a suggestions loop of conflations grows out of them:
studying with one’s private library, one’s private library with the proprietor’s literary
capability, one’s literary capability with the extent of 1’s studying, and so forth, advert

“It’s like a library in right here,” an
uncle not too long ago remarked throughout a go to to my residence, and his tone was an
octave beneath reward.

However the books I personal should not a
library. They’re a non-public assortment I’ve been amassing since childhood,
once I stopped spending cash on Jordans and Cross Colors in favor of
costly hardcovers like The Oxford Full Shakespeare. I by no means might learn greater than a
sonnet or a scene on account of its weight, almost-illegibly small sort, and
onion-skin pages, and I’ve since misplaced it. However from center college to
school, the one factor that happy me as a lot as standing earlier than my spurting bookcase
was standing within the mirror earlier than my rising physique: Shakespeare, an historical
Webster’s I’d inherited from my father, my humanities course books, Hiram’s
Pink Shirt, my mom’s Amharic guide of psalms. It was a mirror of who I used to be
and wished to be; I used to be my books, my books have been me, and the need to jot down
books and reside by them confused the matter ever extra.

I do know that Marie Kondo is correct,
that I’ve by no means wanted greater than thirty books at any time, however a full purge would
kill off older elements of me, or preserve my future self from discovery; proudly owning books
appears like a manner of staving off demise. And but Thomas Jefferson owned books with the identical avidity as he owned black our bodies like mine and Karl
Lagerfeld was as a lot a book-hoarder as he was a bigot. I do know that guide collections change into a pantomime of
erudition, or a flex, as I typically suppose when strolling previous the lit home windows of
tony brownstones in Brooklyn and catch sight of a giant built-in bookcase. And
but when I’ve ever handed one with out the tug of want?

Nobody hoards books like
Amazon, owned by the world’s wealthiest human and named after the planet’s
biggest (and fastest-declining) carbon dioxide sink; Amazon, an organization with one of many worst observe information of addressing our local weather disaster, started as a web based
bookseller, one thing nobody is aware of higher than a guide hoarder like me.

As elements of the world with
better personal capital lay declare to increasingly of our public assets–deepening
racial and financial segregation, simply as at my highschool–Amazon exemplifies
these shifts, from public to personal. E book-hoarding is much less cute should you suppose
of it as book-privatizing. However my studying is ruled by my private library,
not the general public one a number of stops away on the Metropolitan Transit Authority; my
books replicate much less the extent of my studying and erudition than they do a grand shift
in assets from the general public to the personal. And my private library’s
explosion has a lot to do with Amazon, like the difficulty I’ve each time it’s
time to maneuver from one home to a different. Studying books helped me transfer by
highschool hallways, to New York, to Harlem, and proudly owning them now inhibits me
and weighs me down. I purchase with a single click on, and my knee clicks as I haul but
one other bin of books up flights of stairs.

I keep in mind the thrilling comfort of shopping for a guide on-line for the primary time, and the sudden insatiable 2AM want to have The Collected Poems of Langston Hughes or Hiram’s Pink Shirt. As a result of I can! That feeling is separate from the accountability of proudly owning that guide, separate from the act, unfold out over hours, days, and weeks, of studying the guide, separate even from the sensation of being possessed by one. I do know this. And but the second when the mouse hovers over the acquisition button incorporates the promise of transformation, a hope that obliterates the data there is no such thing as a more room on the cabinets. It’s a sense far much less tidy, and much much less private, than pleasure.

Popula is 100% ad-free, reader-supported journalism accountable solely to you. Each greenback of your subscription goes straight to our work. Thanks for supporting Popula.

Mik Awake